From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 04 01:24:49 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 04 May 2004 01:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BKvEI-00087j-Er for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 01:24:42 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 01:24:42 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] ZOI and EOF Message-ID: <20040504082442.GT14939@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7633 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Should ZOI clauses close at end of input? I don't think so, but thought I'd ask. Here's the relevant grammar.300 bit: a. If the Lojban word "zoi" (selma'o ZOI) is identified, take the following Lojban word (which should be end delimited with a pause for separation from the following non-Lojban text) as an opening delimiter. Treat all text following that delimiter, until that delimiter recurs *after a pause*, as grammatically a single token (labelled 'anything_699' in this grammar). There is no need for processing within this text except as necessary to find the closing delimiter. Interestingly, according to grammer.300, "la'o" needs no special proccessing. I'm treating that as an obvious mistake, though. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi