From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 04 13:43:58 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 04 May 2004 13:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BL6lX-0004vT-59 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:43:47 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 13:43:47 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: bysydy .e xypapa Message-ID: <20040504204347.GA7020@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040504201320.GZ14939@digitalkingdom.org> <20040504203621.GE2542@skunk.reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040504203621.GE2542@skunk.reutershealth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7639 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:36:21PM -0400, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote: > OTOH, "by.sy.dy. .e xy.papa" works fine. By the Book, BY has to be > pause-separated from what follows it. It *probably* doesn't cause a > problem when the next thing is another BY, but the results in other > cases are unpredictable. Can you give me an example of such an unpredictable case? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi