From noras@cox.net Tue May 04 23:16:37 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 04 May 2004 23:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakermmtai05.cox.net ([68.230.240.54])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31)
	id 1BLFhc-00046D-FG
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 23:16:22 -0700
Received: from nora.cox.net ([68.228.12.146]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP
          id <20040505003832.SEBW18696.lakermmtao10.cox.net@nora.cox.net>
          for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 20:38:32 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20040504203956.00abb0b0@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Sender: noras@pop.east.cox.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 20:40:43 -0400
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
From: Nora LeChevalier <noras@cox.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: bysydy .e xypapa
In-Reply-To: <20040504204347.GA7020@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20040504203621.GE2542@skunk.reutershealth.com>
 <20040504201320.GZ14939@digitalkingdom.org>
 <20040504203621.GE2542@skunk.reutershealth.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-archive-position: 7645
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: noras@cox.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

At 01:43 PM 5/4/04 -0700, Robin wrote:
>On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:36:21PM -0400, jcowan@reutershealth.com
>wrote:
> > OTOH, "by.sy.dy. .e xy.papa" works fine.  By the Book, BY has to be
> > pause-separated from what follows it.  It *probably* doesn't cause a
> > problem when the next thing is another BY, but the results in other
> > cases are unpredictable.
>
>Can you give me an example of such an unpredictable case?
>
>-Robin

paxydau is a lujvo, not equal to pa.xy.dau


-- 
mi'e noras                                             noras@cox.net
Nora LeChevalier