From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 07 14:10:58 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 May 2004 14:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCcN-0000em-HZ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 May 2004 14:10:51 -0700 Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 14:10:51 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI Message-ID: <20040507211051.GH27947@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040506003409.GI7020@digitalkingdom.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20040506181623.032d1340@pop.east.cox.net> <20040507005112.GL7020@digitalkingdom.org> <87vfj8ofiu.fsf@raphael.poss.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vfj8ofiu.fsf@raphael.poss.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7692 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:36:09AM +0200, Rapha?l Poss wrote: > Besides, we have a design flaw if "si" is supposed to step back into > the ZOI construct "word per word" : what is a word outside Lojban ? > How "si" is going to affect the construct if we cannot break it down > into words in the lojban sense of the term ? My current design, as I stated at the beginning of this thread, is to tread the non-Lojban text as one word for "si" purposes, for that exact reason. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi