From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 07 16:00:39 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 May 2004 16:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BMEKT-0002O2-JU for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 May 2004 16:00:29 -0700 Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:00:29 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI Message-ID: <20040507230029.GX27947@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040507213550.GL27947@digitalkingdom.org> <20040507225642.29440.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040507225642.29440.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7704 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:56:42PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Basically, Y is caught anywhere that *any* Lojban word would > > normally be valid, so it can be used in ZEI, BU, ZOI, and ZO. > > Probably some others. As an *extra* special case, it cannot have > > BAhE applied to it, because that would just be silly. > > Why not restrict it to {ybu} only, then, since it is also silly with > the other words. You could actually be hesitating, and then you have > to start erasing y's, which is very silly. What about 'zo y'? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi