From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri May 07 16:14:09 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 May 2004 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BMEXa-0002ed-AJ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 May 2004 16:14:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20040507231331.47242.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.18] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 May 2004 16:13:31 PDT Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:13:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040507230029.GX27947@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7705 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Why not restrict it to {ybu} only, then, since it is also silly with > > the other words. You could actually be hesitating, and then you have > > to start erasing y's, which is very silly. > > What about 'zo y'? {zo y y y nalselmorjyvalsi} should be the same as {zo nalselmorjyvalsi}, you shouldn't be forced into {zo y y y si si si si zo nalselmorjyvalsi}, and that's assuming you actually count your y's when you hesitate... To actually quote the noise you'd need {zoi ly y y y ly}. I would even advocate abolishing {ybu}, but that's probably out of the question. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover