From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 13 14:11:28 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 May 2004 14:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BONU9-00018D-QI
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:11:22 -0700
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:11:21 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for?
Message-ID: <20040513211121.GS4461@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040513183600.GJ4461@digitalkingdom.org> <20040513193917.GC16333@fysh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040513193917.GC16333@fysh.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 7800
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 08:39:17PM +0100, Zefram wrote:
> I think the cleanest way to handle "y" is to treat it as an erase word
> that erases nothing.  

That's the same thing as treating it as a pause/space, isn't it?

> This means that:
> 
> * it is not necessary to explicitly erase a pause: "le y si lo broda"
> preprocesses to "lo broda"

This is currently the case in my parser.

> * it can be quoted with "zo"; if you want to pause before a quoted
> word, develop the habit of pausing *before* the "zo", as in "y y y zo
> nalselmorjyvalsi"

Same.

> * it can be used as a "zoi" delimiter (though I think the ability to
> use erase words here is bad design; I'd prefer "zoi si zo" to
> preprocess to "zo")

Fair enough.

> * more generally, it's not a special case, making learning easier

Not a special case?  How is an erase word that doesn't erase anything
not a special case?

> How does this interact with "bu" and "zei"?  Is "si bu" valid?  

Yes.

> Incidentally, why was this "bu" system devised?  Why not use, for
> example, "a'y" to "u'y" for the vowels?

"denpa bu", "slaka bu"; it's a general system for producing letterrals.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi