From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu May 13 16:53:47 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 May 2004 16:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41907.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.158]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BOQ1E-0000u6-Tu for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 May 2004 16:53:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20040513233216.92437.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.74.79] by web41907.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 13 May 2004 16:32:16 PDT Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 16:32:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for? To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20040513190312.00ab4e10@pop.east.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7826 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Nora LeChevalier wrote: > But that "single" word invalidates all the documentation on cmavo word > forms. Cmavo currently can only be either a series of vowels or a single > consonant followed by a series of vowels (where "series of vowels" is a > little up in the air as to what's acceptable). CLL says: > Standard cmavo occur in four forms defined by their word structure. > Here are some examples of the various forms: > > V-form .a .e .i .o .u > CV-form ba ce di fo gu > VV-form .au .ei .ia .o'u .u'e > CVV-form ki'a pei mi'o coi cu'u > > In addition, there is the cmavo ``.y.'' (remember that ``y'' is > not a V), which must have pauses before and after it. So, ".y." already is an exception. (The other exception, ".y'y.", seems to have been forgotten here.) In any case, while I admit "ybu" would be a wart type-of word, the alternative seems worse to me: "You can hesitate between any pair of words except after "zo", before "bu", before or after "zei" or between "lo'u-le'u"". Hesitation is not something so easily controllable. This would make zo-, bu- and zei-phrases especially tight, such that they can't be broken by hesitation. Almost word-like. (lo'u-le'u is included in the list above because when quoting words, if {y} is counted as a word it makes a difference. For example {lo'u a bu y zo y zoi le'u cu valsi xamei} is not equivalent to {lo'u a bu zo zoi le'u cu valsi xamei}. {y} would make little or no difference inside a zoi quote because it is unanalyzable, and inside lu-li'u it would be as irrelevant as si. But inside lo'u-le'u it would count, also like si.) mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2' http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861