From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat May 15 15:35:43 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7kl-0001wZ-MQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:35 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:35 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for? Message-ID: <20040515223535.GR6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040514003615.GQ4461@digitalkingdom.org> <20040514005321.96954.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040514005321.96954.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7868 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:53:21PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > SI was operating on Y. Oops. Fixed. > > > > It now says: > > > > sumti6=( ZO=( zo ) zoClause=( y y y si nalselmorjyvalsi ) > > absorbIndicators=() free=() ) > > So Y is not a word from the point of view of SI, except when ZO has > recognized it as one, right? That is what I was doing, but I've backpedalled. I agree with you: treating Y as a word for purposes of ZO and ZEI is just too damned unintuitive. Barring someone objecting in a convincing fashion, my parser treats Y as a space except for Y+BU. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi