From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Sun May 16 01:52:14 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 May 2004 01:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41907.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.158]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPHNM-0003c6-Uu for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 May 2004 01:52:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20040516014453.41549.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.82] by web41907.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 15 May 2004 18:44:53 PDT Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 18:44:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu" To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7876 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Is "bu bu" valid? I know "da bu bu" is, but that's not the same thing. The official parser accepts both "bu bu" and "zei bu" at the beginning of text. They should be either both valid or both invalid. > (It's also an argument for BU acting on multi-word things like zei). Right. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price. http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/