From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun May 16 12:09:22 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 May 2004 12:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPR0b-0003JG-F2 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 May 2004 12:09:13 -0700 Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 12:09:13 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu" Message-ID: <20040516190913.GH6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040516014453.41549.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040516014453.41549.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7887 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 06:44:53PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Is "bu bu" valid? I know "da bu bu" is, but that's not the same > > thing. > > The official parser accepts both "bu bu" and "zei bu" at the beginning > of text. They should be either both valid or both invalid. They are both invalid in my parser. ("zei bu"? TF?) -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi