From sentto-44114-22374-1084763132-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sun May 16 20:06:17 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 May 2004 20:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.66]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPYS2-00029y-MI for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sun, 16 May 2004 20:06:02 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-22374-1084763132-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.29] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2004 03:05:32 -0000 X-Sender: cowan@ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 53802 invoked from network); 17 May 2004 03:05:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 May 2004 03:05:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 May 2004 03:05:30 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPYRR-0008D2-QS; Sun, 16 May 2004 23:05:25 -0400 To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <20040517030525.GA28843@ccil.org> References: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 192.190.237.100 From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 23:05:25 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 7889 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: cowan@ccil.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > Is "bu bu" valid? I know "da bu bu" is, but that's not the same thing. I call them junk. If they happen to work at beginning of text, that's a pointless artifact. Rule them out. On the other thread, I do think "zo .y." is a Good Thing, but I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise (presumably requiring "zoi zoi .y. zoi"?). -- My confusion is rapidly waxing John Cowan For XML Schema's too taxing: jcowan@reutershealth.com I'd use DTDs http://www.reutershealth.com If they had local trees -- http://www.ccil.org/~cowan I think I best switch to RELAX NG. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/