From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Mon May 17 10:33:09 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 17 May 2004 10:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BPlz3-0000q1-Qt
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:33:01 -0700
Message-ID: <20040517173230.87832.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:32:30 PDT
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu"
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20040517170631.GJ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 7892
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> I am, of course, more than happy to be overruled by the BPFK when it
> gets to the various words in question.

Perhaps we should revisit at some point the definition approved 
for "bu":

bu
Combines with the previous word to make a Lojban letteral, provided 
that it is not one of the quote cmavo (ZO, ZOI, LOhU, LEhU) or one 
of the erasure cmavo (SI, SA, SU), ZEI, BAhE, or FAhO. [...]

if {zoi bu} is now to be allowed.

I understand {zo y bu si si da} reduces to {zo da}.
Does {zo y bu si da} reduce to {zo y da}, i.e. {zo da} too?

mu'o mi'e xorxes




	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/