From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 17 11:43:28 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 17 May 2004 11:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BPn56-0001x1-Rm
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 11:43:21 -0700
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:43:20 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu"
Message-ID: <20040517184320.GR6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040517170631.GJ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040517173230.87832.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> <20040517183810.GP6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040517183810.GP6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 7895
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 11:38:10AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:32:30AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > I understand {zo y bu si si da} reduces to {zo da}. Does {zo y bu si
> > da} reduce to {zo y da}, i.e. {zo da} too?
> 
> No, it does not, because that would require a single SI to erase both
> BU and Y.

On a related note, I am coming to truly hate ybu.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi