From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jun 02 13:56:09 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Jun 2004 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BVcmI-0001pS-2e for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 13:56:02 -0700 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:56:02 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca Message-ID: <20040602205602.GH26987@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040602174740.GS818@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040602205243.56289.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040602205243.56289.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 8036 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:52:43PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Both jbofihe and the official parser choke on "li paxa se nanca" but > > are fine with "li paxa nanca". Does anyone know why? > > LALR(1)? The parser gets to {li paxa se} and expects an operator? Yeah, I forgot you could "se" and operator. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi