From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jun 17 19:16:08 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1Bb8vA-00050v-Te for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:16:01 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:16:00 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] fragment + i-jek Message-ID: <20040618021600.GG7569@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 8094 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list The sentence: na mukti .iku'i mi'e la kancu .ije mi mutce nelci le nu kancu The official parser likes it, but the other two do not. I'm assuming the official parser is wrong; fragments cannot be joined by ijeks, but wanted to check. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi