From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Jun 18 17:40:37 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41907.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.158]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BbTuF-0003hd-Io for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:40:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20040619003957.60378.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.26] by web41907.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:39:57 PDT Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:39:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: fragment + i-jek To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040619003154.GZ7569@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8113 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > Same thing, isn't it? {le nu brode} is a fragment. > > I suppose, but {lenu broda kei cu zemucu'o} sure isn't. Right, and you can't join a normal bridi and a fragment with ije. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail