From xod@thestonecutters.net Tue Jun 29 14:37:23 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thestonecutters.net ([63.251.19.112] helo=chert.thestonecutters.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BfQHz-0001q1-C6 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:37:15 -0700 Received: from thestonecutters.net (p78-77.acedsl.com [66.114.78.77]) by chert.thestonecutters.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D84414827E for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40E1E107.7000109@thestonecutters.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:37:11 -0400 From: xod User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Mini-Logfest in CA? References: <20040614041459.GG10520@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20040614041459.GG10520@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-archive-position: 8169 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell wrote: >I have some friends that are running a local Polyamory relaxicon in a >local hotel. As such, they've already done all the hotel leg work. I'm >thinking I might grab a suite over the same weekend and do a >mini-Logfest, with a focus on immersion. > >This is in Northern CA, about equi-distant from SFO and SJC airports. > >This would be August 6 through 8. > >Anyone interested? > > I am. If it goes down, count me in. It's interesting that Logfest is not an official LLG event. How hard was it to phone a hotel and reserve a single suite as was done last year? Or is there so little interest that there's no sense in bothering? -- "At stake in this case is nothing less than the essence of a free society. For if this Nation is to remain true to the ideals symbolized by its flag, it must not wield the tools of tyrants even to resist an assault by the forces of tyranny." Justice Stevens, Rumsfeld v. Padilla