From xod@thestonecutters.net Wed Jun 30 10:15:46 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thestonecutters.net ([63.251.19.112] helo=chert.thestonecutters.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BfigJ-00068I-UT for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:15:36 -0700 Received: from thestonecutters.net (p78-77.acedsl.com [66.114.78.77]) by chert.thestonecutters.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC6A14826A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:58:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40E2F532.3050702@thestonecutters.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:15:30 -0400 From: xod User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Mini-Logfest in CA? References: <20040614041459.GG10520@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <40E1E107.7000109@thestonecutters.net> <20040630165331.GP17338@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20040630165331.GP17338@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-archive-position: 8177 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell wrote: >On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:37:11PM -0400, xod wrote: > > > >If you want to re-use the same hotel, be my guest. I'll show up. I'd >rather something more central, though. > Judging from the response, you'd be the only one who did. I assume there are lurkers who would appear yet are remaining silent in this discussion, but there's no way anyone can be expected to book a hotel suite without quite a bit more enthusiasm. -- "At stake in this case is nothing less than the essence of a free society. For if this Nation is to remain true to the ideals symbolized by its flag, it must not wield the tools of tyrants even to resist an assault by the forces of tyranny." Justice Stevens, Rumsfeld v. Padilla