From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jul 13 09:13:39 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BkPuK-0006Xs-8c
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:28 -0700
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:28 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Flexible!  Except when we're not.
Message-ID: <20040713161327.GO7925@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040713070716.GM7925@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040713123726.61955.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> <20040713150209.GH26687@ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040713150209.GH26687@ccil.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 8240
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:02:09AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Jorge Llamb?as scripsit:
> 
> > What was the reason {jo'i} is not in VUhU?
> 
> Because it is designed for specifying vectors or tuples.  "pi'e"
> should not be used for this purpose.

That's good to know, and implies that (for example) we should be using
jo'i for times and dates in most cases, but it doesn't actually answer
the question.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"