From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jul 19 23:53:51 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BmoVT-0003xt-B3
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:53:43 -0700
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:53:43 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: 3-way calling.
Message-ID: <20040720065343.GU1391@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040719000913.GI3825@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <40FC13D9.8060604@thestonecutters.net> <20040719184935.GW3825@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <40FC1EDE.1080907@thestonecutters.net> <20040719192600.GY3825@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407191431150.7553@clarion.cec.wustl.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407191446430.8538@clarion.cec.wustl.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407191446430.8538@clarion.cec.wustl.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 8270
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:19:58PM -0400, xod wrote:
> > > > Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > > >.i ku'i ro ckaji cu na zukte gi'e nai gasnu
> > > >
> > > > je'enai
> > > >
> > > > .i tu'a zoi zoi. agentive .zoi cu srana zo gasnu .u zo zukte
> > >
> > > na go'i .i tu'a zoi zoi. agentive .zoi cu srana zo gasnu ba'e .e
> > > zo zukte
> > >
> > > > .i ganai mrobi'o gau lo kamlenku gi ky. catra
> > >
> > > na'i .i mrobi'o ri'a lo kamlenku
> >
> > .ienai .i pe'i lo nunlenku .enai lo kamlenku ka'e rinka
> 
> ta'o .i lu .ienai broda li'u se smuni ge'i
>     lu mi toltugni fi lodu'u broda li'u
> gi
>     lu mi toltugni fi la'edi'u .i pe'i broda li'u

Ummm.

I have no idea how to answer "Not the former but the latter."  Nor, for
that matter, am I sure how to answer "Not the latter but the former",
which is what I actually believe in this case.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"