From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jul 24 12:54:21 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BoSat-0003bE-Nm
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:54:08 -0700
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:54:07 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: mekso samples.
Message-ID: <20040724195407.GD11612@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040722235721.GE2295@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <200407231630.08280.phma@phma.hn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200407231630.08280.phma@phma.hn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 8324
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:30:08PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2004 19:57, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > You all might be interested to see
> >
> > http://www.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/regular/test.pdf
> >
> > which has Lojban followed by the results of the LaTeX mode of my
> > parser on said Lojban.
> >
> > It's pretty intense, and is (as far as I know) the first usage of
> > ge'o.
> 
> Is {ge'o obu} omicron or omega? What's the other?

Oh, shit.  {ge'o o bu} is clearly omicron; omega is {ge'o <whatever the
BU is for "w", which I don't remember}.

People who know more about greek are welcome to smack me down.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"