From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Fri Aug 13 14:24:15 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [216.189.121.177] (helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BvjWx-0005Cz-2E for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:24:07 -0700 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E26F54B07; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:23:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Summer School lojban Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:23:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408131723.35568.phma@phma.hn.org> X-archive-position: 8445 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Friday 13 August 2004 16:58, riderofgiraffes wrote: > I would be interested to see if people who have learned lojban and > use lojban are more likely to get this question right. Clearly this > "test" won't actually answer that question, but I thought people > here might like the logical puzzle, that they might be interested in > the question, and perhaps they might be interested in the subject in > general. > > Clearly I was wrong, so I'll go away and not bother again. You are not wrong; we are interested (though this one we've seen before). I sometimes find myself rearranging quantifiers in English to match the prenex order, which I didn't do before learning Lojban. phma -- li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa