From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Aug 19 10:50:12 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bxr32-0002wG-Qj
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:50:01 -0700
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:50:00 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: samselpli ?
Message-ID: <20040819175000.GU5127@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040817235553.GZ3538@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040818084944.GB24841@fysh.org> <20040818191959.GG13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040819092423.GB3076@fysh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040819092423.GB3076@fysh.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 8502
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:24:23AM +0100, Zefram wrote:
> In building lujvo, is it required that "samselpli" and "sampli"
> express the same relationship (but with permuted places), in the
> manner that "selpli" and "pilno" express the same relationship?

No, very much not.

> Currently we have "samselpli" and "sampli" defined with different sets
> of places.

I never put samselpli in jbovlaste, actually.  I was just noodling.

sampli is in there, though.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"