From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 17 11:47:59 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C8Nlr-0007gJ-Mj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:47:47 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:47:47 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: New poll for lojban Message-ID: <20040917184747.GJ23979@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040917180004.GG23979@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040917183212.85273.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917183212.85273.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 8623 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > Do you really find {ni} more clear than {xokau}? I'm not sure what "xo kau" means. I have conceptual problems with kau. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"