From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Sep 22 11:24:44 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CABmn-0008Ia-GY for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:13 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:13 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: fractions Message-ID: <20040922182413.GK1650@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <8a.15bd704a.2e82b504@wmconnect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a.15bd704a.2e82b504@wmconnect.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 8649 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 06:59:16AM -0400, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > If "pimu" (.5) is to be used for 1/2 (which practice I abhor), > then how is a number like 1/3 to be expressed? Or 1/17, for a > more complicated example. li pi ra'e ci li pa fi'u ci li pa fe'i ci The other: li pi ra'e no mu bi bi re ci mu re so vo pa pa ze xa vo ze li pa fi'u pa ze li pa fe'i pa ze I personally loathe fi'u, because it's in PA instead of VUhU, which makes things not work as you'd expect at *all*. For example, (1+2) over (2+3) can't be done using fi'u: li vei pa su'i re ve'u fi'u vei re su'i ci -- unparseable, because fi'u is not an operator. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"