From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Oct 19 10:50:10 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJy79-0001Hb-CC for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:49:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20041019174903.96037.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:49:03 PDT Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:49:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: jordis To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20041019172954.4991.qmail@web51602.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8776 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- jordi mas wrote: > > (2) > > xu do me le fanva be abu > > "Are you among those I describe as the translators > > of A?" > > > > (3) > > xu do du le fanva be abu > > "Are you the one(s) I describe as the translator(s) > > of A?" > > So the difference between (2) and (3) is that > (2) asks is a set is a subset of another, > while (3) asks for identity, is that it? Yes, except that the sets are not mentioned explicitly. If you wanted to say it in terms of sets, it would be something like: (2a) xu lu'i do klesi le'i fanva be abu (3a) xu lu'i do du le'i fanva be abu (Assuming {klesi} can mean "x1 is a subset of x2".) mu'o mi'e xorxes _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com