From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Oct 19 13:15:56 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CK0Oa-0004EY-9V for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:15:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20041019201501.82656.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:15:01 PDT Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:15:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: jordis To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20041019195831.GD32722@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8784 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:13:31PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > He did use {le}. > > In the *very* orginial he used "la jordis", no? I take this one is the veriest original: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/23123 --------------------------------------------------- coi jordis .i pau do du le fanva be la .Abiuord bei le katlana? mu'omi'e pier. --------------------------------------------------- > > Another post I had not seen was stevo's "mi te ganlo fa mi", which > > nobody answered perhaps because nobody received it. > > I doubt that *nobody* received it, as a lot more people are on the > yahoogroups list. Ah, but what proportion of frequent posters are on yahoogroups? :) mu'o mi'e xorxes _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com