From philip.newton@gmail.com Sun Oct 31 12:29:07 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.207])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1COMJt-0001zA-UH
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:28:58 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so91510rnk
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:28:41 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=Shwoctryj4I+uec0NgA6SoypzLsJdpPahZ+4CylxDmnoyLTF5qD0eExGsgSEuosc0XG9K827Wk76GYkYJrQIsSnpRTtEfmt9BwNfj6QiBKzkUnfsnebu58XvV1m9vAPlTaKWIz9lX2W2qF5WFlcu81kBD/YwYIjoW+618JWrx5k=
Received: by 10.38.15.78 with SMTP id 78mr62694rno;
        Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.15.24 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <537d06d00410310002749a997f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:02:00 +0100
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: ba'e
In-Reply-To: <1099175989.15812.6.camel@ben>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
References: <96.17c61ca9.2ea7039d@wmconnect.com>
	 <20041020163924.GI32722@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <537d06d0041021012245ba97a5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1099175989.15812.6.camel@ben>
X-archive-position: 8896
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: philip.newton@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:39:49 +0000, Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 10:22 +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> > P.S. Your Reply-To header was a bit strange, listing (as it did) the
> > mailing list twice).
> 
> Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
> X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
> X-list: lojban-list
> X-Evolution-Source: imap://treed@localhost/
> 
> Are you sure that addition isn't on your side?

Ah, so it seems to be; the raw message only has it once in the
Reply-To header. My best guess is that the second address was culled
from the Mail-Followup-To header - which is probably redundant if
Reply-To is present, no?

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>