From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Sun Oct 31 18:10:26 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [216.189.121.177] (helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1COReE-0006a3-9U
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:10:18 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id C5E9E837C; Mon,  1 Nov 2004 02:09:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] tu'e in relative clause
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:09:45 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200410312109.45782.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-archive-position: 8902
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

I just wrote the following in [[auskalerik]]:

ni'o la .auskalerik. cu vasru ze gugypau poi tu'e vo ke'a cu zvati la sangug 
.ije ci ke'a cu zvati la fasygug. tu'u .i la .Arabak .e la gipuskuak .e la 
nafaruak .e la biskaiak. zvati la sangug .ije la diz.nafaruak .e la lapurdik 
.e la suberuak. zvati la fasygug

jbofi'e chokes on {tu'e}. Why? How should I say it?

phma
-- 
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci