From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Nov 03 10:21:41 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:21:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CPPlE-0001IY-2X for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:21:32 -0800 Message-ID: <20041103182058.49411.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:20:58 PST Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:20:58 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: na scope. Again. To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20041103181408.47683.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8932 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Jorge Llambías wrote: > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 07:12:16AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > I am doing the section on NA, which should cover some of that. My > > > intention is to propose an interpretation where the scope of {na} > > > is restricted to what follows it. > > > > This would change the meaning of simple negations like "mi na klama > > le zarci", would it not? Good mabla luck. > > Not at all, how would that change? There are no quantifiers > or connectives to interact with {na} there. What it would change is simple negations like {mi e do na klama le zarci}. Instead of meaning that either I don't go, or you don't go, or both, it would mean that neither I nor you go. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com