From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Tue Nov 30 18:07:13 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [216.189.121.177] (helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CZJtY-0005OJ-A6
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:07:04 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7DB39850A; Wed,  1 Dec 2004 02:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Founders: {se ma'i} and {te ma'i}
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:06:29 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20041130193515.GP25791@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041130193515.GP25791@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411302106.29948.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-archive-position: 9059
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Tuesday 30 November 2004 14:35, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Here's the best I've come up with for examples:
>
> ''mi tadni lo te bilma se ma'i lo selci''
>
> "I study disease with standardized observation of cells."
>
> ''mi tadni lo te bilma te ma'i tu'a lo kumfa co jinsa be so'a da''
>
> "I study diseases with observation rules relating to a room clean of
> almost all contaminants."
>
> Are these good enough?  Can you guys think of anything better?

I am lost trying to make sense of these. How about {la tcomolunmas. galrai be 
tema'i lenu le xamsi cu pinta be'o cmana}?

phma
-- 
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci