From jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com Wed Dec 22 17:03:14 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from web51604.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.209]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ChHNf-0007SE-6E for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:03 -0800 Received: (qmail 67474 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Dec 2004 01:02:32 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=sKCr8wQ2avQa126RX+CTPqgVE5jHwSGUUCR0CA7AXXnyKlOnyqPniAm5KsOmuEPHU7GMfF0uXLigcHJar2JrOgLOJmy0nhIZyfA6GK2hB+gkA7EfkOmzYGQY4YaJHMSDLMupWah4e6cNTCHfU8v0EeAEfM+/wgY3G2kKSD71hko= ; Message-ID: <20041223010232.67472.qmail@web51604.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.57.112.53] by web51604.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:02:32 PST Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:02:32 -0800 (PST) From: jordi mas Subject: [lojban] Re: Founders: ja'o and ni'ikri To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20041223004018.GI20429@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 9112 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > > Is {jinvi fo no} good enough for these? > > It is, but what I don't see is why krici should > *require* a total > lack of evidence. There are very few people who > would ever say that > the believe *anything* in an utter abscence of > evidence. In your culture, maybe. In mine, whoever said "credo quia absurdum" would qualify, and then I've met some of those people, sometimes. Anyway, there are awful lots of people who would cheerfully say that others believe anything or something in an utter abscence of evidence, which would make that useful, and btw don't put me between quotes: as a non-native English speaker I might as well be allowed a slip from time to time as long as you understand what I meant. --jordi ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com