From rspeer@MIT.EDU Mon Dec 27 21:04:00 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:04:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9WT-00010A-Cn for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:03:53 -0800 Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iBS53oRQ011498 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iBS53m5A029186 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iBS53mgd023870 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from torg.mit.edu (TORG.MIT.EDU [18.208.0.57]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id iBS53f20001324 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cj9Wl-0004Wx-00 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:04:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:04:11 -0500 From: Rob Speer To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] mi xruti mi ti Message-ID: <20041228050411.GA17068@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-archive-position: 9125 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list After ceasing to follow Lojban for a semester because I was taking 6 classes, which was too many, I'm back. I've skimmed through the mailing list now. Here are the things that I've perceived as going on since September: * lots of awesome work has been done on the PEG morphology * something probably happened with xorlo, but I can't tell what * the scope of {na} was debated some more Indeed, what has gone on with xorlo now? Has there been more support for making {na} act like {naku}? And what else has happened? -- Rob Speer