From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Thu Jan 06 17:43:34 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cmj9x-0003OA-Ex for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:25 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D7BD84A7; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:42:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Metric units Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:42:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20050106155148.6701.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106155148.6701.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501062042.45756.phma@phma.hn.org> X-archive-position: 9191 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:51, Jorge "Llambías" wrote: > --- Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > We should be very cautious about introducing new gismu. But if we do > > introduce a new gismu, we should at least make sure that it has a unique > > four-letter rafsi. > > {.enri} or {.e'enri} then. I think {xe'enri} would be better since it can be combined with a prefix without using {zei}. Most of the henries I've seen are milli or micro. phma -- Without glasses, I can't even distinguish smells... -Les Perles de la médecine