From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Thu Jan 06 18:02:51 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:02:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmjSZ-0008HR-St for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:02:40 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2CFBE841E; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:02:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Metric units Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:02:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20050106143845.98922.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501062102.07779.phma@phma.hn.org> X-archive-position: 9192 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:28, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Jorge Llambías wrote: > >> henry > > > > xenri > > > > (It would have clashed with xenru with the gismu algorithm, > > but I don't think that's a problem here.) > > I think it is a problem. > > We should be very cautious about introducing new gismu. But if we do > introduce a new gismu, we should at least make sure that it has a unique > four-letter rafsi. Also {barno} clashes with {barna}. As only subatomic physicists use the barn, I don't think it needs a gismu. phma -- GCS/M d- s-: a+ C++ UL++++$ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+ o? K? w-- O? M- V- Y++ PGP++ t- 5? X? R- !tv b++ DI !D G e++ h+>---- r- y>+++