From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jan 09 19:01:46 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Cnpo6-0006eX-Rd
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:01:26 -0800
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:01:26 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Help with "beak", please.
Message-ID: <20050110030126.GO4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20050110012429.GN4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050110020135.66826.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050110020135.66826.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 9213
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 06:01:35PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > What about making a lujvo of "bartu moklu" for snout, and then
> > attaching "jgalu" to that?

I realized later that "jipno" is better than "bartu".

> Doesn't "snout" involve the nose too? 

Point.

> If so, then {nazbi} already contains the idea of protrusion, so
> {nazmo'u} could be "x1 is the snout/nose-mouth of x2". 

Indeed.

> beak: the bill of a bird; esp. the bill of a bird of prey adapted
> for striking and tearing.
> 
> bill: the jaws of a bird together with their horny covering.
> 
> xedja: x1 is a/the jaw [body-part] of x2
> 
> So {xedja} by itself could be used for bill/beak if you are
> talking about a bird. If it's not a bird you're talking about

It is not; it is in fact a non-existant being that happens to be
imagined to have a beak similar to a bird.

> so that you need to specify more the type of xedja, then maybe
> {ja'urxe'a} or {cakyxe'a} or maybe {cpismixe'a}. 

I think ja'urxe'a is most what I want, since I want focus on the
weapon-like-ness of the beak.  Thanks.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/