From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jan 16 12:27:30 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CqGza-0004od-Tk for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:23 -0800 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:22 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Opinions, please: SA by structure Message-ID: <20050116202722.GM10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20050114195516.GW22838@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <537d06d0050115032029bd6ac1@mail.gmail.com> <20050115201114.GB10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 9277 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:15:38PM -0600, Adam D. Lopresto wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >You could also (probably; we haven't hashed this out yet) do {mi > >vecnu do lo cukta sa da sa lo cukta do}, effictively counting > >back two terms, but I don't actually expect anyone to do this. > >"da" was used as "any term" there. > > I don't see how that would work. It looks to me like the first > {sa da} would strip out {lo cukta} and replace it with {da}, > leaving {mi vecnu do da}, then the next {sa lo cukta} would turn > it into {mi vecnu do lo cukta}, and then a final {do} for {mi > vecnu do lo cukta do}. Err. Serry, there was supposed to be a {si} after {sa da} for just that reason. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/