From philip.newton@gmail.com Sun Jan 16 12:34:35 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.198])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CqH6S-0004vF-M6
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:34:28 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so208562rnf
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:34:05 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=TGyLxlZyGKKMugV6QlbCSPedcAecKLrZ/aPa07BKLzVUde94iJESvL6v4dJlgjiHDp8viFBe2g8VF5JJLdWh4AYdhZsbtR8c2NZQSKuDE32JX3Lln3lZBRGIueo72WxFPcmN2soufkEsJl+5iXgWe2a6swWRf61oUV/D5F2G/t8=
Received: by 10.38.164.80 with SMTP id m80mr101352rne;
        Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.208.61 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <537d06d0050116123475483ce3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:34:05 +0100
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Octopus?
In-Reply-To: <200501161216.14099.phma@phma.hn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
References: <20050115202824.GH10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <537d06d00501160723127fa2ca@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200501161216.14099.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-archive-position: 9278
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: philip.newton@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:16:13 -0500, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 16 January 2005 10:23, Philip Newton wrote:
> > .oktopoda, perhaps? Based on the good ol' "oblique form of the
> > Greek/Latin word" method. Or curnrxoktapoda, perhaps, if you want a
> > stage-3. (Though I'd be tempted to make it curnrxtapodi, based on the
> > Modern Greek form.)
> 
> What about {oxtapodi}?

That would work for me, too, and it's a reasonable blend of
"oktopous"/"oktopoda" and "xtapodi".

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>