From zefram@fysh.org Thu Jan 20 08:02:56 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fysh.org ([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Crell-0004EN-8f for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:02:49 -0800 Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Crelj-0006BX-00 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:02:47 +0000 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:02:47 +0000 From: Zefram To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: outer and inner quantifiers on "le" Message-ID: <20050120160247.GG3649@fysh.org> References: <20050120140217.GD3649@fysh.org> <20050120152013.16360.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> <20050120152620.GF3649@fysh.org> <537d06d005012007536d53253d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537d06d005012007536d53253d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-archive-position: 9294 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Philip Newton wrote: >On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:26:20 +0000, Zefram wrote: >> How so? Is {pa fi'u re} not equivalent to {pimu} here? > >Correct. > >Or so, I believe, the proposal goes. What's the difference between them? -zefram