From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jan 23 18:25:33 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Cstuw-0002Kp-Em
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:25:26 -0800
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:25:26 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] "But if that were true..."
Message-ID: <20050124022526.GX2342@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 9323
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

I found myself with:

    mi pacna lo nu na broda

Where broda was very complicated, and wanting to say "but *if* it
were true, then".

I used

    .i ku'i lo ja'a se go'i ja'a mukti ...

But I'm pretty sure that doesn't "fix" the na in the previous
sentence.  I'm quite sick right now, and too brain-dead to figure
this out on my own.  Help?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/