From adamgarrigus@gmail.com Tue Jan 25 09:31:47 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:31:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CtUXT-0005rb-Kt
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:31:39 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so98541wra
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:31:08 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=a+Tav1ItyY5dQFdlhynwaOpt52MJ5wSyAC5jhJBT90wHw10alav6GOY526a+EG0DVZfgF5kouJS8PRyGq5/1kM6dslhyiVoOcbbhuUzQcklH1ILujuyYUf5TMSF540vjn8oEtp8aSlQ/4+TqS4kY+KmZiAk7SshUm9E1YR2wGKw=
Received: by 10.54.33.41 with SMTP id g41mr213408wrg;
        Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.35.24 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <12d58c1605012509316ead6b11@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:31:08 -0500
From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
In-Reply-To: <BA62D4D0-6EE0-11D9-9B83-000A95C58224@xahlee.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
References: <20050125140142.81370.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <BA62D4D0-6EE0-11D9-9B83-000A95C58224@xahlee.org>
X-archive-position: 9332
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

It's always seemed to me that most languages have their "extras" or
"frills" & Lojban's no exception. Evidentials can be expressed in
bridi. {tu'a} doesn't seem necessary. Off the top of my head it seems
that if you retain {bo} you can dump {ke ... ke'e}.

But I am dying to know what you're planning to do with, er, {lo
cmajbobau} . Is it a secret?


On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:52:26 -0800, xah lee <xah@xahlee.org> wrote:
> 
> i haven't learned about KOha, I, UI... but i know there are bo and (ke,
> ke'i)... surely lojban isn't complete without these??
> 
>   Xah
>   xah@xahlee.org
>   http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html