From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 02 07:44:06 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CwMfe-0003CV-Nx
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:43:58 -0800
Received: (qmail 53638 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2005 15:43:27 -0000
Message-ID: <20050202154327.53636.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:43:27 PST
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:43:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Minimal Lojban
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20050202150305.8284.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 9405
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--- John E Clifford wrote:
> Standard logic -- when it wants to dispense with
> parentheses without going Polish -- has a system
> of depth tags (usually something like ', '', ...
> or ., :, and so on).  Can {bo} be repeated to
> give closer and closer bindings? 

Not with the current grammar, no.

> Or subscripted?

Yes. The parse tree in this case won't reflect any difference 
in binding, but this would not be the only place in the grammar
where the parse structure does not reflect the logical structure
anyway.

mu'o mi'e xorxes




		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail