From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Feb 11 13:02:06 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CzhvK-0002vO-4k
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:01:58 -0800
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:01:58 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Archivists (and others): What is the x1 of bapli?
Message-ID: <20050211210158.GN7929@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 9454
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

The two definitions in the bapli entry in the gi'uste are
self-contradictory:

x1 [force] (ka) forces/compels event x2 to occur

x1 determines property x2 to manifest

In one, the x1 is limited to ka, in the other, the x2 is limited to
ka.

What's up with that?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/