From treed@surreality.us Wed Feb 23 00:05:47 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:05:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from 70-32-97-160.ontrca.adelphia.net ([70.32.97.160] helo=localhost) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D3rWX-0005So-Mk for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:05:34 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3rWT-0002E8-HO for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:05:29 -0800 Subject: [lojban] Re: blast from the past From: Theodore Reed To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20050221164116.50682.qmail@web81305.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050221164116.50682.qmail@web81305.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2NZn6pxP8I8d9mOIKM3I" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:05:28 -0800 Message-Id: <1109145928.8091.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.5 X-archive-position: 9514 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: treed@surreality.us Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --=-2NZn6pxP8I8d9mOIKM3I Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 08:41 -0800, John E Clifford wrote: >Totally off the controversy. The post-1975 >growth of Loglan brought in at least a dozen >people who were drawn by the Heinlein. They by >and large did not go looking for Loglan because >of the reference (and they wouldn't have found it >if they had) but responded to the announcement >when it came because they remembered the >Heinlein. This was a larger group than (or maybe >just the same size as) the group who were >following up on the 1960 SA article (in spite of >the fact that the announcement was primarily in >SA). Unlike Esperanto, almost none of the early >new Loglanists were word-of--mounth. I know I've mentioned this before, but I came into Lojban specifically because of a Heinlein book. Although it wasn't TMIAHM. I hadn't read that yet. I was reading Number of the Beast, and there are references to Deety programming with Loglan. I was curious if this was a real programming language. So I hit google. I found both Lojban and Loglan. I initially dismissed Lojban because it appeared to be a half-assed fork from people who decided that they didn't like the way Loglan was being run (full-assed, now I realize). Then I noticed the conspicuous lack of any Loglan community to speak of. That was the end of that. --=-2NZn6pxP8I8d9mOIKM3I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHDlHw24JwM4aDNwRAiC+AJ9cYhCa2D34KZ4iMj8jekfeVqHeBgCgikKM 0BinmK7urq0Bth1zVJWbi2A= =jaam -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2NZn6pxP8I8d9mOIKM3I--