From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 14 10:50:43 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DAueC-0008Rf-DR
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:50:36 -0800
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DAueA-0008Qy-M4
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:50:36 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2075663wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:49:58 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=SJF4rgsChLkqkX1/54dTGSPZWmgJ4XMrNJygwh+CXg1INOQOXEzJAqDFmlyQ3XsU+e3k0MgFSqgh5ofcwn8lO4hy3+yItSsDjNBhRvPc9OEWpxH0W8qMFgNu3xFYWEEcgPMaCVuvcnXvO3IxFIuy9zkiH+TFmxILBbt7s6lhr64=
Received: by 10.54.84.17 with SMTP id h17mr761071wrb;
        Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:49:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.35.76 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:49:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <12d58c1605031410495f28122c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:49:58 -0500
From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: shark
In-Reply-To: <12d58c1605031410383ae07271@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
References: <200503120857.23340.phma@phma.hn.org>
	 <12d58c160503140708331f94d7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200503141212.52721.phma@phma.hn.org>
	 <12d58c1605031410383ae07271@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9582
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:38:50 -0500, Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah. Those fu'ivla look fine, none better than the next. Or you could
> construct a lujvo using words for a distinctive feature peculiar to
> sharks. zo'o I'm not going to challenge your ichthyology skillz again.
> Look forward to seeing your decision.
> 
P.S. Without going into too much detail, I would go with {karxara}
among those variants based on the Greek word "karkharos":jagged,
choosing the mnemonic value of harmonizing the final vowel over the
significance of the omikron/iota in the Greek. mu'o mi'e .adam. noi
smaji