From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Mar 18 17:08:30 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DCSRy-000320-T9
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:08:22 -0800
Received: from web81309.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.84])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DCSRw-00030X-Q0
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:08:22 -0800
Message-ID: <20050319010749.71865.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.69.48.37] by web81309.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:07:49 PST
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:07:49 -0800 (PST)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: SE with conjunctions
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9617
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Well, as noted recently, SE is mainly a
rhetorical device, with a little logical value
for scopes and  maybe some other things.

--- Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org> wrote:
> SE is grammatical with both logical and
> non-logical conjunctions, but the only 
> usage mentioned in the refgram is {se} with
> logical conjunctions, of which 
> the only ones it makes a difference with are
> {u/ju/gi'u/gu'u/gu}. What does 
> {te ju} mean? Does {se} make a difference with
> any JOI (I think it should 
> with {ce'o}, {fa'u}, and, if I understand it
> right, {pi'u})?
> 
> phma
> -- 
> Maintenant, j'ai besoin d'une loupe pour
> trouver mes lunettes!
> 	-Les Perles de la médecine
> 
> 
> 
>