From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 28 05:02:29 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DFtsj-0006xC-9m
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:02:13 -0800
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DFtsZ-0006qZ-SF
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so292340wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:01:30 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=W9POOKahNYeypTw2w1JhSoiqf5vsNrH7Wd96yWbk0Q7EFhitNGRwjw6O2soZDLH9PCTRahyLdsz0UKNJmjXGCmVD4BKvcbX9wqg4Wbpm/qjFyiqF5IARz3R+AIpT/D17vTQQmKs9OGfR5K/wAc5JBnksR1tU90/Il79Fx8i1I+s=
Received: by 10.54.99.18 with SMTP id w18mr1642076wrb;
        Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.69.3 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <925d175605032805012bfd8fdf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:01:30 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: mi fanva da 2
In-Reply-To: <79.422911f3.2f795524@wmconnect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <79.422911f3.2f795524@wmconnect.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9687
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:40:04 EST, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com
<MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com> wrote:

> > xu lu na'onai le nu smacu cusku cu xamgu zmadu le nu tavla li'u 
> 
> You need {na'onai ku}, or else move {na'onai} in front of the selbri, 
> 
> {na'onai} is already in front of the selbri (isn't it?), since the bridi
> it's part of is quoted by {lu/li'u}. 

The selbri that {na'onai} modifies is {xamgu zmadu}.
As written, {na'onai} is tagging the sumti {le nu smacu cusku}.
You want either: {na'onai ku le nu smacu cusku cu xamgu 
zmadu le nu tavla} or {le nu smacu cusku cu na'onai xamgu 
zmadu le nu tavla}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes