From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 30 07:23:28 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DGf2O-0005SJ-2g for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:23:20 -0800 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DGf2L-0005S9-Uu for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:23:19 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so229049rne for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:23:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tGuDnyqTc9UIbZrmiScc+f2fSmZbcnvjJX6yfHz5gqCKVQC9Q7oyk4qB5eLVIAovOaN9jaT5Z30DPPfTl4KzEsmyMb3OjhXJ2Xk5Ak+lpLm8hP9SOGriOV0nwkXUPsAKSdgrZ6Dmxh1zt6ts0l9rnQm3+YkBL+V0wywm0luO2KI= Received: by 10.38.87.21 with SMTP id k21mr496069rnb; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.152.79 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:23:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4c4e58c1050330072354c1c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:23:15 +0100 From: Evgeny Sklyanin To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] usage of to...toi [was: fu'ivla] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 9713 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eks2005@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Theodore Reed wrote: >ganai do djica lo nu do pilno loi rusko lerfu to .e lo drata toi gi do kakne jbofi'e does not accept the parenthesized phrase {to .e lo drata toi}. If we delete {.e} then {to lo drata toi} becomes acceptable. It seems that the parenthesized phrase has to be a grammatically correct sentence. Is there any way to include the conjunction {.e} as the author intended? mi'e .evgenis.