From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 30 10:13:22 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DGhgo-0000dC-6V
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:13:14 -0800
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DGhgo-0000d5-4R
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:13:14 -0800
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:13:14 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: usage of to...toi [was: fu'ivla]
Message-ID: <20050330181314.GW7061@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <4c4e58c1050330072354c1c9@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4c4e58c1050330072354c1c9@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 9716
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:23:15PM +0100, Evgeny Sklyanin wrote:
> Theodore Reed wrote:
> >ganai do djica lo nu do pilno loi rusko lerfu to .e lo drata toi
> >gi do kakne
> 
> jbofi'e does not accept the parenthesized phrase {to .e lo drata
> toi}. If we delete {.e} then {to lo drata toi} becomes acceptable.
> It seems that the parenthesized phrase has to be a grammatically
> correct sentence. Is there any way to include the conjunction {.e}
> as the author intended?

The solution I employ in LNC is to ri .e lo drata toi

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/